by Alex Gonzalez
Political pundits for a longtime have claimed that because Texas is a”conservative” state, Hispanics in the state, who are 90% Mexican-American, are more inclined to vote as “Republican” than those Hispanics in California, a Democrat and liberal state. However, while that may be good party propaganda in “Republican” party circles stemming from trivial claims that Hispanics are “conservatives” because they are “pro-family,” hardworking and self-reliant, the outcome of the 2018 Mid-term Election shows that those claims have been misconceptions. In a state like Texas where 40% of the population are Hispanics, Republicans have almost no “Hispanic Representation” in the legislature and in U.S. House of Representative. In fact, Hispanics in Texas may be very traditional, pro-family, hardworking, and self-reliance, but that does not make them “Republicans.”
And though both Texas and California have similar demographics where about 40% of the populations are Hispanic, there is a stronger Hispanic Democrat presence in the Texas legislature than in the California legislature, or even higher. As a result, claims that Hispanics in Texas will tend to vote more Republican than Democrat are false, and Hispanic Representation if both the Texas and California legislature proves that.
Texas and California House Seats
Texas has 150 House seats while California has only 80. Therefore, the only way to more accurately measure Hispanic “Representation” is by adding all the Hispanics elected to the Legislatures in Texas and California and take the percentages from the total members elected from both Republicans and Democrats. see chart below
The chart above shows that there is a stronger Hispanic Democrat presence in the Texas House at 26.26% than in California where it is only 20.70%. It turns out, among Hispanics, Hispanics in Texas are actually more Democrats than their cousins in California. As a result, while there may be a slight cultural variation between Democrats from Texan and Democrats from California, it appears that in Texas more Hispanics are running and getting elected as Democrats than in California.
Here is the total ideological representation in percentages:
CA 80 House seats: 20% of Hispanic Representation in the House, 95% D. Of all the 20 Hispanic members in the California Legislature, only one is “Republican.”
TX 150 House seats: 26.67% Hispanic Representation, 39 Democrats 1 Republican. 67 Democrats, 83 Republicans. Of the 39 Hispanics in the Texas House, only 1 is “Republican,” JM Lozano who swtiched from Democrat to Republican after Republicans in the Texas Legislature redrew his district.
It is not clear what killed the “Hispanic Republican” brand, I’m not sure if it was Trump-ism or Cruz-ism or the tea party, but where six years ago there were 5-6 Hispanic Republicans, now there is only one.
Texas and California Senate Seats.
The Texas and California Senates have almost identical Hispanic Representation.
TX 31 Senate seats. 19.35% Hispanic Representation, 5 Democrats and 1 Republican seat won by Pete Flores in especial election two months ago totaling 6 Hispanics. There are 19 Republicans and 12 Democrats.
CA 40 Senate seats: 15% Hispanic Representation, 27 Democrats (6 Hispanics, all Democrats), 9 Republicans.
Texas and California: U.S. House of Representatives
Texas 36 seats: 19.44% Hispanic Representation ( 6 Hispanic Democrats, 1 Republican; and to be fair, Bill Flores (TX 17th) has never claimed to be Hispanic, but he is; so if you add Bill Flores, Hispanic Representation from Texas jumps from 16.67% to 19.44% and then again like in Texas and California Senates, Hispanic Representation is almost identical. see chart below
California 53 seats: 20.75 % of Representation ( all represented by Democrats), 44 Democrats ( 11 Hispanics), 8 Republicans.
If you were not to take into consideration Pete Flores, who won in special election in SD-19, a Democratic-friendly Texas Senate district where state Sen. Carlos Uresti, D-San Antonio, resigned earlier this year after 11 felony convictions and JM Lozano, the only Republican left in the Texas House, who switched from Democrat to Republican after Republicans in the Texas Legislature redrew the district, Hispanic Republican Representation would be zero.
I grew a in state that passed Prop 187 in 1994. And at the time, many were arguing why California was pushing this anti-immigration Hispanics laws while Texas remained a pro-Hispanic immigrant state, because, 1 Republicans in Texas were very pro-Hispanic, and the then Governor of Texas George W. Bush was also pro-Mexico. The other argument was that, unlike Hispanics in California that had been pushed into the economic and political peripheries, Mexican-Americans in Texas had been incorporated into power structure – the political and business class. Thus, Mexican-Americans in the Texas didn’t feel antagonize by Republican Party apparatus.
And that was the argument that for a long time many political “pundits” used as the foundation to fervently suggest Hispanics in Texas, who were middle-class pro-business and traditional culturally “conservative,” would inevitably be inclined to vote Republicans. However, many factors have change from those old assumptions in the Republican Party. And now, even if Hispanics in Texas are cultural conservative, pro-family, and pro-business, they are not becoming Republican.
Alex Gonzalez is a political Analyst, Founder of Latino Public Policy Foundation (LPPF), and Political Director for Latinos Ready To Vote. Comments to email@example.com or @